Solar Flood Lights
If space is awash with particles, why describing it as a Vacuum?

Solar winds made of ions, photons and particles radiation spread in all directions from home. So why do scientists claim a space for a vacuum when it seems fairly complete for me. This density of the particles must be able to use as a means or power. Reducing the amount of thrust / acceleration needed to travel faster than light. I can not understand the language used in Einstein's relativity, but I can not imagine that could have lost this, or can I? We apologize for the spelling "Void." LOL How long have been the stars on fire, and yet have flooded the space? Doradus is about 170,000 light-years away, however, is visible from Earth with the naked eye tells me that a lot of space has been occupied by him! real question is injected into the space of volcanoes too large.

In the complicated world of physics there is no such thing as a vacuum, "" a region of space that has no body heat, no no particles. . . A vacuum may mean something else, is described as an airless void, although their radiation is still present.

Be Sociable, Share!

•